Censorship & Control, Under the Guise of Promoting Public Health?
A breakdown of the WHO's New Pandemic Treaty & IHR Amendments with Attorney, Philipp Kruse
I had the pleasure of interviewing Philipp Kruse, Swiss attorney-at-law, towards the end of last year. Kruse, who has been a lawyer since 1997, has led more than 20 court proceedings against the “harmful and unconstitutional corona-mandates” by the end of 2020. His team were the first to file a landmark criminal complaint against Swissmedic (Switzerland’s medicinal product regulator) for authorising the high-risk mRNA COVID-19 shots.
Please consider upgrading to a paid subscription to support the ongoing production of reports like this.
The Swiss lawyer is also an expert on the World Health Organisation’s proposed new pandemic treaty and amendments to the International Health Regulations. He asserts that censorship and control is at the heart of these two legally binding documents, which pose a real threat to our fundamental human rights. Both legal instruments will be voted upon this May at the 77th World Health Assembly.
Watch Kruse’s highly informative presentation below.
Many thanks for posting this. Unfortunately over the past couple of years many of those who protested against lockdowns, Covid testing, mask mandates, vaccine passports and vaccine mandates during 2020, 2021 and into January 2022 have become distracted by irrelevant topics such as local vehicular traffic management issues etc.
I would like to invite you over to Operation save humanity substack for more topics on the topics you are presenting here and all the proof through their own patents total exposure operationsavehumanity.substack.com